View the profiles of people named Joshua Cooley. During his questioning of Henkel, Gorsuch posed a question that seemed to help Cooleys case by wondering what remedy, if any, would be available for a non-Indian against a tribal officer akin to a 1983 or Bivens claim. Argued March 23, 2021Decided June 1, 2021. SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. filed. App. (internal quotation marks omitted). The officer also noticed that Cooleys eyes were bloodshot. This is me . The officer looked inside and claimed that he saw the driver had bloodshot, watery eyes and that a little boy was climbing on his lap. View Joshua Cooley results in Colorado (CO) including current phone number, address, relatives, background check report, and property record with Whitepages. Because these provisions do not govern violations of state law, tribes would still need to strike agreements with a variety of other authorities to ensure complete coverage. We held that it could not. The Ninth Circuit affirmed. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020. Saylor took Cooley to the Crow Police Department where federal and local officers further questioned Cooley. Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Because Saylor was not clear on Cooleys alleged lawbreaking until after the truck was searched, Saylors seizure had been unauthorized and the evidence from the two unlawful searches conducted by the tribal officer was suppressed. The District Court granted Cooleys motion to suppress the drug evidence that Saylor had seized. Cooley, 919 F.3d 1135, 1139-1141 (9th Cir. Most notably, in Strate v. A1 Contractors, See, e.g., Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co., Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress filed. Even a cursory review of Duro and Strate, however, reveals that [the Supreme Court] did not recognize that Indian tribes possess the broad authority to detain, investigate, search, and generally police non-Indians. In issuing a standard which would force Tribal law enforcement to wait until domestic violence became apparent or obvious to execute a search, the Ninth Circuits decision threatened the lives of Native women. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. Saylor spoke to the driver, Joshua James Cooley, and observed that Cooley appeared to be non-native and had watery, bloodshot eyes. 9250 Clayton Str, Thornton, CO 80229-3837 is the current address for Joshua. At the same time, because most of those who live on Indian reservations are non-Indians, this problem of interpretation could arise frequently. 554 U.S. 316, 330, this case does not raise that concern due to the close fit between Montanas second exception and the facts here. Joshua James Cooley - Sheridan, WY - Has Court or Arrest Records v. 1:16-cr-00042- SPW-1 JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, Defendant-Appellee. As the Solicitor General points out, an initial investigation of non-Indians violations of federal and state laws to which those non-Indians are indisputably subject protects the public without raising similar concerns of the sort raised in our cases limiting tribal authority. Quick Facts 1982-06-1 is his birth date. WATCH LIVE: Ex-boyfriend on trial for allegedly killing womans new beau, WATCH LIVE: Psychic on Trial in Spousal Swindling Case, WATCH LIVE: XXXTentacion murder trial 3 men charged in 2018 shooting death of rapper, Law&Crime Looks Ahead to 10 Remarkable Criminal Trials Scheduled for the First Half of 2023, 9 Shocking Times Defendants Testified at Trial, Judge throws the book at boyfriend for killing and dismembering girlfriend, whose remains were scattered outside their home, Coward rapper: Florida gang member shoots rival in the back, then raps about it on social media: Sheriff, A bald Alex Murdaugh appears in booking mugshot after hes sentenced to two life terms for killing wife and son, Im a father and I couldnt do this: Florida man convicted of murdering almost 3-month-old baby boy, Jan. 6th rioter who stole Officer Michael Fanones badge following Capitol assault pleads guilty, 'Coward rapper': Florida gang member shoots rival in the back, then raps about it on social media: Sheriff, A bald Alex Murdaugh appears in booking mugshot after he's sentenced to two life terms for killing wife and son, 'I'm a father and I couldn't do this': Florida man convicted of murdering almost 3-month-old baby boy, Jan. 6th rioter who stole Officer Michael Fanone's badge following Capitol assault pleads guilty, Former reality TV star gets life sentence for murder-for-hire plot targeting nephew, New Jersey appears to be edging out its New York neighbor in SCOTUS battle over regulation of waterfront, Justices focus on two ways to duck deciding the legality of Bidens student loan forgiveness plan during oral arguments in major cases, Justices Gorsuch and Barrett face off as strange SCOTUS lineup backs millionaire with hundreds of foreign bank accounts, Justice Ketanji Brown Jacksons first opinion on the Supreme Court decides who gets to keep millions in unclaimed funds, SCOTUS takes up major case that could end Obama-era federal agency created after 2008 financial crisis, Justice Sotomayor pens majority SCOTUS opinion saying Arizona cant ignore federal law as Justice Barrett fiercely dissents. Brief amici curiae of Crow Tribe of Indians, National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. W A I V E R . Instead, [the Supreme Court] at most recognized a narrow circumstance in which a tribal officer possesses a limited authority to detain non-Indian offenders and transport them to the custody of state or federal authorities. Respondent Joshua James Cooley hereby moves, pursuant to 18 U.S.C 3006A and Supreme Court Rule 39.6 and 39.7, for appointment of Eric R. Henkel as his counsel in this matter. See more results for Joshua Cooley. Record from the U.S.C.A. 191414. Brief amici curiae of Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al. Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. Brief amici curiae of Cayuga Nation, et al. Instead, Justice Breyers opinion went further, and re-affirmed the constitutional authority of Congress to restore the Tribal jurisdiction that Oliphant previously erased, once again concluding that [i]n all cases, tribal authority remains subject to the plenary authority of Congress. At a time when NIWRC and so many others are working hard to get a bipartisan VAWA through the Senate, it is highly significant that the Supreme Court, once again, has confirmed Congresss constitutional authority to restore Tribal jurisdiction over non-Indian defendants. We also note that our prior cases denying tribal jurisdiction over the activities of non-Indians on a reservation have rested in part upon the fact that full tribal jurisdiction would require the application of tribal laws to non-Indians who do not belong to the tribe and consequently had no say in creating the laws that would be applied to them. Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020. Docket for 19-1414 - Supreme Court of the United States joshua james cooley: Birthdate: 1830: Death: 1914 (83-84) Immediate Family: Son of henry cooley and susannah rebecca cooley Husband of maria cooley Father of john cooley. 510 U.S. 931 (1993). 520 U.S., at 456, n.11. (Appointed by this Court. Joshua Cooley (James), 40 - Mason, MI Public Reputation Profile at Joshua James Cooley in the US . The location was federal Highway 212 which crosses the Crow Indian Reservation. Joshua Cooley, Texas (27 matches): Phone Number, Email, Address - Spokeo DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020. Record requested from the U.S.C.A. It was Feb. 26, 2016 on Highway 212, where Indian Highway Safety Officer James Saylor arrested Joshua Cooley after finding several guns and 356 grams of methamphetamine inside his vehicle. Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress filed. Brief amicus curiae of Indian Law Scholars and Professors filed. Brief amicus curiae of Indian Law Scholars and Professors filed. In addition, the Court sees nothing in existing federal cross-deputization statutes that suggests Congress has sought to deny tribes the authority at issue. 1.06 2.93 /5. Brief for United States 2425. Barrett then wondered why tribal authorities have the ability to conduct a temporary Terrystop but not conduct an arrest. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship. Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. StrongHearts Native Helpline Record from the U.S.C.A. Finally, the NIWRCs brief argued that the Ninth Circuits decision intruded upon the exclusive authority of Congress to manage Indian affairs. LOW HIGH. The search resulted in the seizure of a handgun, glass pipe, and a bag containing methamphetamine. CONTACT US. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Eric R. Henkel, Esquire, of Missoula, Montana, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. (Distributed). JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY, Respondent, On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the . Pursuant to Rule 39 and 18 U.S.C. Joshua Cooley was in the driver's seat and was accompanied by a child. 153, 155159, 967 P.2d 503, 504506 (1998); State v. Ryder, 98 N.M. 453, 456, 649 P.2d 756, 759 (1982); see also United States v. Terry, 400 F.3d 575, 579580 (CA8 2005); Ortiz-Barraza, 512 F.2d, at 11801181; see generally F. Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law 9.07, p. 773 (2012). Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. (Distributed). Brief amici curiae of Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al. The United States filed a petition to have the Ninth Circuit panels probable-cause-plus opinion reheard en banc (before the full circuit court as opposed to a three-judge panel). Brief amici curiae of Current and Former Members of Congress filed. Joshua Cooley Profiles | Facebook Justices heard about a police officer stop on the Crow Reservation in Montana, where a non-Indian was found with drugs and was charged with . Joshua James Cooley, Joshua J Cooley. While on a routine patrol late at night, a Crow Nation police officer stopped at Cooleys truck, which was parked on the side of a state highway that runs through the reservation, and questioned Cooley regarding his travel plans. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley filed. The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments on Tuesday in United States v. Cooley, a case thatoccurs both literally and figuratively at the intersection of American and tribal law. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley in opposition filed. While the Court agrees the Montana exceptions should not be interpreted so as to swallow the rule, Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co., The Crow Nation led dozens of Tribal amici curiae in support of the United States petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. 89. Main Document: Oct 28 2020 entering your email. The arguments, which took place via teleconference, lasted about an 1 hour and 10 minutes. PDF W A I V E R - Supreme Court of the United States UNITED STATES V. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY 3 Washington, D.C. Tuesday, March 23, 2021, the above-entitled matter came on for oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States at 10:00 a.m.APPEARANCES: ERIC J. FEIGIN, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; on behalf of the Petitioner. 18 U.S.C. 3731. As the NIWRC pointed out, the very highway where Crow police stopped James Cooley runs through Big Horn County, where cases of 32 and counting missing or murdered Native women or girls have occurred, making Big Horn County one of the counties with the highest rates of homicide of Native women and girls in Montana, and among the highest nationwide. Joshua James Cooley: Address 38*** **** Dr, Jefferson, MD, Phone (301 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States. Phone:406.477.3896 Such threats may be posed by, for instance, non-Indian drunk drivers, transporters of contraband, or other criminal offenders operating on roads within the boundaries of a tribal reservation. In the wee hours of February 26, 2016, a police officer saw a pickup truck with out-of-state plates idling on the side on a remote stretch of highway. The question presented is whether an Indian tribes police officer has authority to detain temporarily and to search a non-Indian on a public right-of-way that runs through an Indian reservation. (Due October 15, 2020). ), Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Donate, By Mary Kathryn Nagle, Cherokee Nation, Pipestem & Nagle Law, Counsel to NIWRC, and Julie Combs, Cherokee Nation, Associate Attorney, Pipestem & Nagle Law, Update on United States v. Cooley, United States Supreme Court, NCAI Task Force on Violence Against Native Women, Request Housing Training and Technical Assistance, Sovereignty - An Inherent Right to Self-Determination, President Biden Signs the VOCA Fix to Sustain the Crime Victims Fund Act of 2021, Restoration Magazines Transferred to the Obama Presidential Center, In Honor of Shirley Moses A Beloved Sister, AKNWRC Founding Member and Board Chairwoman, NIWRC Awarded Thriving Women Grant from Seventh Generation Fund for NativeLove, Carrying Our Medicine Forward NIWRC's 10-Year Anniversary, Unci Tillie Black Bear Annual Women Are Sacred Day, October 1, Unci Tillie Black Bear, A Legacy of Movement Building, StrongHearts Native Helpline Launches Project in Michigan, 6-Point Action Plan for Reform and Restoration, The Failed Response of State Justice Agencies to Investigate and Prosecute MMIW Cases, NIWRC Updates MMIW State Legislative Tracker, Pouhana O Na Wahine Joins Hawaii State MMIW Task Force, Not Invisible Act Consultation, September 10, 2021, Family Violence and Prevention Services Act 2021 Reauthorization, Violence Against Indigenous Women Migrating to the United States, VAWA National Tribal Baseline Study Update. ), Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. The conclusion that Saylors actions here fall within Montanas second exception is consistent with the Courts prior Montana cases. Feigin pushed back a bit about the framing of the question but Gorsuch got his way and the government attorney said he thought the adjudicatory process was probably where the Major Crimes Act begins. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020. Given the close fit between the second exception and the circumstances here, we do not believe the warnings can control the outcome. Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. LUMEN CHRISTI HIGH SCHOOL. And they are also underinclusive. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. Oct 15 2020. Picking up on Thomass questionsregarding heinous crimes, Alito later pressed Henkel on a slippery slope argument that questioned what the standard should be for if and when an Indian tribal officer has any authority to intervene against a non-Indian whatsoever. You can explore additional available newsletters here. Those standards require tribal officers first to determine whether a suspect is non-Indian and, if so, allow temporary detention only if the violation of law is apparent. 919 F.3d, at 1142. According to Saylor, he saw that Cooley was a non-Indian at the point when he first saw Cooley through the car window. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Eric R. Henkel, Esquire, of Missoula, Montana, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. Argued. The Ninth Circuit concluded that Saylor had failed to make that initial determination here. We do think the tribe can do that, the government attorney argued. filed. REASONS FOR DENYING THE PETITION; This case does not present an important question . Cf. Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 24, 2020 to August 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. (Distributed). for the Ninth Circuit . Henkel argued there isnt a remedy beyond exclusion of evidence, which appeared to be the answer Gorsuch was looking for. The driver relayed a story about having pulled over to rest. See, e.g., Brief for Current and Former Members of Congress as Amici Curiae 2325; Brief for Former U.S. Attorneys as Amici Curiae 2829. Cooley was charged with crimes in federal court, and moved to suppress the evidence as the fruit of an illegal search. They are overinclusive, for instance encompassing the authority to arrest. Reply of petitioner United States filed. Argued. Joshua Cooley's birthday is 12/31/1992 and is 29 years old.Before moving to Joshua's current city of Jefferson, MDJefferson, MD Holding: A tribal police officer has authority to detain temporarily and to search a non-Native American traveling on a public right-of-way running through a reservation for potential violations of state or federal law. This Court granted the government's petition for a writ of certiorari Pp. The NIWRC argued that ultimately the Ninth Circuits decision would impede the policy goals Congress has issued in combating violence against Native women, and Native women and girls would suffer as a result. In doing so we have reserved a tribes inherent sovereign authority to engage in policing of the kind before us. Fearing violence, Saylor ordered Cooley out of the truck and conducted a patdown search. Contact NIWRC See, e.g., Brief for Former United States Attorneys as Amici Curiae 24 (noting that 3.5 million of the 4.6 million people living in American Indian areas in the 2010 census were non-Indians); Brief for National Indigenous Womens Resource Center etal. For these reasons, we vacate the Ninth Circuits judgment and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A). View More. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion. The Court then cited the NIWRCs brief, which contained the statistic that more than 70% of residents on several reservations are non-Indian, to support that because most of those who live on Indian reservations are non-Indians problems with interpreting when the apparent standard is met could arise frequently.. 0 Add Rating Anonymously. Respondent was represented by counsel appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. In response, Cooley cautions against inappropriately expand[ing] the second Montana exception. Brief for Respondent 2425 (citing Atkinson, 532 U.S., at 657, n.12, and Strate, 520 U.S., at 457458). Facebook gives people the power to. See OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the court of appeals (Pet. PDF In the Supreme Court of the United States Two lower courts ruled that a tribal officer cannot detain a non-Indian on a federal roadway unless it is apparent at the time of the detention that the non-Indian has been violating state or federal law. The phrase speaks of the protection of the health or welfare of the tribe. To deny a tribal police officer authority to search and detain for a reasonable time any person he or she believes may commit or has committed a crime would make it difficult for tribes to protect themselves against ongoing threats. Feigin said the tribes authority to detain comes from the inherent sovereign authority that Indian tribes had before they were incorporated into the United States and which they never lost. The government attorney added that this authority is not granted by the Constitution or Congress but that it is recognized by both of those sources and admitted that were not looking at some specific provision.. 435 U.S. 313, 323 (1978). U.S. Supreme Court: United States v. Joshua James Cooley Get free summaries of new US Supreme Court opinions delivered to your inbox! Brief amici curiae of National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. Brief amici curiae of Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation filed. See Strate v. A1 Contractors, Document11 (1).docx - UNITED STATES V. JOSHUA JAMES COOLEY The Court of Appeals denied this petition as well. Cf. However, VAWA 2013 directly contradicts this assertion because in VAWA 2013, Congress unmistakably acted to close jurisdictional loopholes by restoring the ability of Tribal Nations to exercise criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians for crimes of domestic violence, dating violence, and criminal violations of protective orders. Brief amici curiae of The Ninth Circuit Federal Public and Community Defenders filed. This is a principle that has repeatedly been affirmed by the nations high court in various prior cases. Fall 2022 Dean's List announced - etsu.edu 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. Cooley adds that federal cross-deputization statutes already grant many Indian tribes a degree of authority to enforce federal law. The Court identified in Montana two exceptions to that general rule, the second of which fits almost like a glove here: A tribe retains inherent authority over the conduct of non-Indians on the reservation when that conduct threatens or has some direct effect on . In all cases, tribal authority remains subject to the plenary authority of Congress. Because many reservations are home to a predominantly non-Indian population, including many of the 26 VAWA-implementing Tribal Nations, the Ninth Circuits unworkable standard for Tribal law enforcement in effectuating stops of non-Indians suspected of committing a crime on reservations threatened to jeopardize Native womens safety further. (Corrected brief submitted - March 22, 2021), Brief amicus curiae of Citizens Equal Rights Foundation filed. The nations farthest left justice clearly set Henkel back on his heels a bit and the line of questioning ending with Henkel pointing out that the ICRAs analogue was the actual point of lawwhich audibly did not satisfy Sotomayor, who would have continued her unfriendly inquiry, but who had to move on due to her time running out. The District Court then granted Cooleys motion to suppress the drug evidence and the United States appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Response due July 24, 2020). Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, et al. In addition, recognizing a tribal officers authority to investigate potential violations of state or federal laws that apply to non-Indians whether outside a reservation or on a public right-of-way within the reservation protects public safety without implicating the concerns about applying tribal laws to non-Indians noted in the Courts prior cases. 450 U.S. 544, 566 (1981); see also Strate v. A1 Contractors, Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 24, 2020 to August 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020. Brief amicus curiae of Indian Law Scholars and Professors filed. Brief amici curiae of Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation filed. The Cheyenne people and cultural lifeways are beautiful and thriving here. filed. Saylor was directed to seize all contraband in plain view, leading Saylor to discover more methamphetamine. The brief was the NIWRCs eighth amicus brief filed pursuant to the VAWA Sovereignty Initiative, aimed at educating federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court, on the connection between sovereignty and safety for Native women and protecting the Violence Against Women Acts restoration of Tribal sovereign authority to prosecute non-Indian offenders. Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 24, 2020. We have previously noted that a tribe retains inherent sovereign authority to address conduct [that] threatens or has some direct effect on . We believe this statement of law governs here. 0 Reputation Score Range. In answering this question, our decision in Montana v. United States, 554 U.S. 316, 327328 (2008). It added that a tribal police officer nonetheless could stop (and hold for a reasonable time) a non-Indian suspect, but only if (1) the officer first tried to determine whether the person is an Indian, and, if the person turns out to be a non-Indian, (2) it is apparent that the person has violated state or federal law. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Breyer, J., delivered the, Heidepriem, Purtell, Siegel & Hinrichs, LLP, Party name: Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, and the Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation, Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona, Party name: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Party name: The Ninth Circuit Federal Public and Community Defenders, Party name: Citizens Equal Rights Foundation, Party name: Former United States Attorneys, Party name: National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, Patterson Earnhart Real Bird & Wilson LLP, Party name: Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, Party name: Indian Law Scholars and Professors, Party name: National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations, Party name: Current and Former Members of Congress. Joshua Cooley, 1924 - 1986 Joshua Cooley 1924 1986 North Carolina North Carolina Joshua Cooley was born on month day 1924, at birth place , North Carolina, to James Cooley But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. United States v. Joshua James Cooley - SoundCloud If left untouched, the brief argued, the Ninth Circuit standard would be nearly impossible to implement consistently and would serve only to incentivize criminals to lie about their identity. NIWRCs work to eliminate domestic violence against Native women and children is directly implicated by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision eliminating the authority of tribal law enforcement to conduct a reasonable suspicion Terry stop on a non-Indian traveling within reservation borders. (Response due July 24, 2020). Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion. Brief amici curiae of Former United States Attorneys filed. While waiting for the officers to arrive, Saylor returned to the truck. The second requirement introduces a new standard into search and seizure law and creates a problem of interpretation that will arise frequently given the prevalence of non-Indians in Indian reservations. Re: United States of America v. Joshua James Cooley - MoreLaw Careers Martha Patsey Stewart. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. denied, Sign up to receive a daily email filed. Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed. Elijah Cooley. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joshua James Cooley. Genealogy for Joshua Cooley (1798 - 1880) family tree on Geni, with over 230 million profiles of ancestors and living relatives. Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Eric R. Henkel, Esquire, of Missoula, Montana, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case. We have subsequently repeated Montanas proposition and exceptions in several cases involving a tribes jurisdiction over the activities of non-Indians within the reservation. Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States. 19-1414 . Brief amici curiae of Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation filed. Brief amici curiae of Crow Tribe of Indians, National Congress of American Indians and Other Tribal Organizations filed. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including February 12, 2021. Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021. Brief of respondent Joshua James Cooley filed. The District Court agreed with Cooleys argument and found it is unreasonable for a Tribal police officer to seize a non-Indian suspect on a public right of way that crosses the reservation unless there is an apparent state or federal law violation. Even though the officer observed that Cooleys eyes were bloodshot and watery, and two firearms were in plain view in his truck, the District Court concluded that none of these factors individually, or cumulatively, were enough to constitute an obvious state or federal law violation, and therefore the Tribal officer had no authority to seize the contraband.
Timekeeper Granville County Schools, Port St Lucie Beach Volleyball, Articles J